|
Network Rail published the Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) for the c2c (and
ONE) routes in April 2007. This document sets out the proposed strategy for
improving the routes performance & capacity over the next 10 years or so.
What follows here is a brief summary of the items concerning c2c and the full
document can be found on
Network Rails website. TRUG will be proving feedback to Network Rail on this
document as part of the RUS process. If you have any comments, please
let us know.
Summary of the RUS:
Peak loading on trains arriving Fen St.
| |
08:00 -08:59
Load Factor |
Passengers |
07:00 - 07:59
Load factor |
Passengers |
| Main Line |
80% |
8,868 |
72% |
16,479 |
| Ockendon Branch |
90% |
2,479 |
79% |
3,435 |
| Tilbury Loop |
76% |
2,173 |
65% |
4,734 |
The load factors indicate that crowding is most severe on the Ockendon branch
services. Closer examination of the data revealed that nine trains were carrying
more
passengers than they have capacity for and that as a result six percent of all
passengers on the Thameside route (around 1,500 arriving passengers per am peak)
were standing in overcrowded conditions. Examination of the loadings along the
routes has been possible using the train weighing data supplied by c2c. The
figures (below)show that there are more passengers than seated capacity provided
over the three hour morning peak from Upminster for Main Line and Ockenden
Branch services and from Dagenham Dock on services on the Tilbury Loop.

On the Thameside route the service structure is influenced by the complexity of
the network and different stopping patterns. The limited signal capacity at West
Ham does not allow additional trains to call without reducing capacity between
Fenchurch Street and Barking. The single line track section between Upminster
and Grays via Ockendon has only one passing loop which causes a capacity
constraint on this section. In addition peak capacity is heavily used between
Barking and Upminster where the signalling headways increase from two minutes to
three.
Main sources of delay in 2005/6: Split (Network Rail vs Train/Freight
Companies) 32:68
| Cause |
Issue |
Mitigations |
| Freight terminal operations |
Late starts and waiting acceptance |
Performance effects of late running
freight services are currently being
analysed by Network Rail’s Six
Sigma team |
| Fleet failures |
Mainly EMU traction problems |
Monitoring traction maintenance |
| OHLE faults |
Dewirements |
Programme of OHLE rewiring
being undertaken |
| Train crew issues |
Awaiting train crew |
Revised instructions now in place
covering crew relief |
The highest levels of delay are occurring at the following key route sections:
Tilbury Loop, the breakdown for the whole c2c route is as follows:
Thameside route section Average Delay per Incident (minutes)
Tilbury Loop 31 minutes
Fenchurch Street – Shoeburyness 20 minutes
Ockendon Branch 19 minutes Proposed Developments in c2c area, affecting
train services Essex Thames Gateway:
* development
of the old Shell Haven refinery into a
container port, logistics terminal and
business centre creating 16,500 jobs potential to increase freight trains each * way
to between19 – 25;
*
redevelopment of the town centre
for retail, leisure and business;
*
and
development of a university campus in
Southend providing 6,500 jobs.
*
new developments
along the Thames in the Barking – Thurrock
corridor as part of the Communities Plan.
*
Potential new Cement import Terminal near Grays
Barking Reach Development:
* area 210 hectares creating 200 new jobs and
10,000 new homes.
*
Increase in freight movements from the Channel Tunnel via a new link at Barking
Passenger Focus
Passenger Focus is the independent
National Rail consumer watchdog: its
mission is to get the best deal for Britain’s
rail passengers. Passenger Focus are keen
that a) the current need for passengers
to stand for in excess of 20 minutes is
eliminated; and b) that there is sufficient
capacity on all routes to meet demand
to 2016. They stress that getting to the
station is integral to travelling by train, with
capacity to park cars a key area to address. TfL
in preparing their
Rail Corridor Plan
(RCP) and 2025 Vision wish to promote a
4 tph (train paths per hour) all day service on all the key radial
routes, (currently Pitsea - Grays -Ockendon - Fenchurch & Grays - Rainham -
Fenchurch St are 2tph c2caspirations
c2c wish to continue to operate the best performing route in the country. In
terms of passenger growth and market needs they wish to see the following:
* improved capacity and performance on services via Ockendon;
* Grays bay platform extended, so that 8 car trains can terminate;
* more trains calling at West Ham for interchange to Docklands;
* trains lengthened to meet demand.
* linespeeds to be improved between Barking and Upminster
Future Passenger Forecasts (these models suggest future loadings on the
route) Predicted Changes in Passenger Journeys
(AM Peak UP Direction; Do-minimum)
| Route |
2016 |
2021 |
| c2c |
15% in passenger numbers |
17% in passenger numbers |
| Predicted Crowding on Passenger Services AM Peak; UP Direction; Do-minimum |
c2c |
| Passengers standing in “unacceptable” conditions
Number of people a day in Up direction
Percentage of total in parentheses |
|
| 2004 (Actual) |
1,600 (6%) |
| 2016 (Forecast) |
5,600 (18%) |
| 2021 (Forecast) |
5,900 (18%) |
| Trains over PIXC Capacity
Number of trains in Up direction
Percentage of total in parentheses |
|
| 2004 (Actual) |
9 (20%) |
| 2016 (Forecast) |
23 (50%) |
| 2021 (Forecast) |
23 (50%) |
Note:
“unacceptable conditions” are defi ned as being reached when passenger are
standing on trains which have exceeded their standing
allowance.
PIXC (Passengers in excess of capacity) - very complicated to calculated but
a rough guide is that a train is PIXC if for every 100 seats 35 people are
standing for over 20 minutes
These are the stations from where passengers stand on an average day on the
busier services during the morning peak. (Current figures)
| |
Standing From |
Time Spent Standing |
| Main Line Services |
Benfleet |
40 minutes |
| Tilbury Loop Services |
Grays |
35 minutes |
| Branch Services |
Ockenden |
30 minutes |
Committed enhancement schemes:
Grays 8-car Bay Platform Funded by NRDF, the bay platform at Grays is to be
extended to eight cars to permit the operation of more 8-car trains on the
Tilbury Loop
West Ham will provide another access point to the Olympic Games and closing up
signals enabling more trains to call there are proposed.
Strategic
Options:
Option 1: Lengthen peak services on the Thameside Main Line (Shoebury -
Fenchurch St via Basildon)
We tested extending trains to 12-car to accommodate increases in passenger
demand. This is intended to alleviate crowding for passengers and to handle
predicted demand growth. This would require additional rolling stock but no
infrastructure.
Conclusion
This option allows capacity to be met as demand rises and requires no
infrastructure development on the
route.
Option 2: Lengthen peak services on the Tilbury Loop and Ockendon Branch
We tested extending trains to 12-car to accommodate increases in passenger
demand. This is intended to alleviate crowding for passengers and to handle
predicted demand growth. In addition to a requirement for additional rolling
stock, platforms on the Tilbury Loop and Ockendon branch would be extended to
accommodate the longer trains
Conclusion
This option allows trains to be lengthened to suit the rates of development on
the route and offers some flexibility in our approach to meeting increased
passenger demand. The busiest trains operate via Ockendon and it is worth
examining whether a stronger business case can be developed by phasing the
intervention.
Option 19 (part) Increase speeds between Barking and Upminster
An increase in speed is being investigated in order to improve journey
times/performance margins. Work may also be required in conjunction with this to
improve the regulation of trains running to / from the Ockendon Branch. This work
would be funded through the NRDF.
Station Improvements
The RUS also mentions a survey carried out in 2002 regarding congested
stations. The findings are listed here. We would assume the proposals concerning
Chafford have recently been implemented in the latest rebuild of the station:
| Station |
Issue |
Mitigation |
| Fenchurch Street |
Circulation through and from subway. Circulation up main stairs,
around ticket widows and barrier line. Circulation on platforms |
Widen subway and improve access stairways. Move main
stairway back to improve ticket hall/circulation at platform level. Move
CIS to improve barrier line circulation. Review seating layout on
platforms.
To be taken forward in the station Master Plan |
| Barking |
Congestion in the ticket hall |
Potential to improve the gate line. |
| Chafford Hundred |
Congestion on platforms, stairs, barrier line during evening peak. |
Increase capacity of stairs, gate line and entrance. |
TRUGs response can be found
here
Updated 11/05/2007
|